
Keeping your CMM calibrated is essential for maintaining reliable measurement data and confidence in your inspection process. However, there is no single calibration interval that applies to every machine or manufacturing environment.
In reality, calibration frequency is usually defined by a company’s own quality management system, alongside factors such as machine usage, environmental conditions and inspection requirements.
At Status Metrology, one of the most common questions we are asked is how often a CMM should be calibrated. The answer is not simply about fixed time intervals, but about how manufacturers monitor and maintain confidence in machine performance over time.
CMM calibration is used to confirm that a machine is measuring accurately and performing within an acceptable operating standard.
During calibration, engineers use calibrated artefacts, typically precision length bars, to verify and adjust the machine before producing an accuracy statement. Status Metrology also provides UKAS-accredited calibration services for manufacturers requiring traceable and accredited calibration.
If adjustments are required, the machine can be corrected either physically or digitally to bring it back within its intended operating standard.
Even very small changes in machine performance can affect measurement results. Heavy usage, environmental conditions, accidental knocks and general wear can all influence accuracy over time, which is why ongoing verification and calibration are important parts of any quality management process.
While calibration and verification are closely related, they are not the same process.
Verification is typically used as a fact-finding exercise to confirm that a machine continues to perform within an acceptable level using a known artefact or reference part. Unlike calibration, verification does not usually involve making adjustments to the machine.
Many manufacturers implement their own verification routines between scheduled calibrations to monitor machine performance over time.
This is commonly carried out using either a recognised artefact, such as a Swift-Check, or a known “golden part” retained specifically for ongoing verification purposes.
Following calibration, the artefact or golden part is measured and the results recorded to establish a known baseline. The same item can then be measured periodically moving forward as part of the customer’s own verification routine.
By monitoring those results over time, manufacturers can identify drift, monitor trends and determine what level of variation is acceptable within their own process, along with when further investigation or adjustment may be required.
The frequency of these verification checks is entirely determined by the customer’s own quality management system and operational requirements.
Most standard CMM calibration work is carried out using calibrated artefacts to verify and adjust the machine before an accuracy statement is produced.
Laser interferometry equipment may also be used where a full error mapping or remapping procedure is required, particularly if a machine is found to be significantly outside tolerance.
The machine’s error map is effectively a three-dimensional compensation model of the machine’s measuring volume. Because no manufactured mechanical system is ever perfectly accurate, very small geometric deviations can naturally exist throughout the machine’s travel. The error map allows the software to compensate for those deviations during measurement, preventing machine errors from influencing the reported inspection results.
There is no universal answer when it comes to CMM calibration frequency. The right approach will depend on the machine, the environment it operates in and the quality procedures being followed within the facility.
Factors that commonly influence calibration and verification routines include:
In many cases, annual calibration forms part of a company’s documented quality management system. Manufacturers may specify that inspection equipment is verified annually either to National Standards or through UKAS-accredited calibration procedures.
Ultimately, the objective is not simply to follow a fixed interval, but to maintain confidence in the measurement performance of the machine and the inspection data being produced.
At Status Metrology, we provide calibration, servicing and metrology support for a wide range of CMM systems. We can also help customers establish practical verification routines that support long-term measurement confidence and inspection reliability.
Whether you require UKAS-accredited calibration, ongoing servicing or technical support, our team can help keep your measurement systems operating accurately and reliably.
If you have any questions about CMM calibration, verification or ongoing machine performance, contact the team at Status Metrology.
Get a free, no-obligation valuation from our expert team. All major brands considered.
Get your free valuation